Sunday, December 31, 2006

December 31 2006 So long, farewell, auf wiedersehen...




I'm not sure about the current movie adaptation of "The History Boys" because I've not seen it, but I am sure that the stage production is superb. I saw this on Broadway a while back, and seeing it here on its "home turf," if you will, is an extra added bonus. It's like these schoolboys stepped right off the street and onto the stage for the afternoon. Even though there is a seedy aspect to some of the lessons these boys are learning, this story still sits squarely in the middle of the great "plays and movies about teachers" genre that always weakens me at the knees. I don't think you can embrace this profession without a bit of the old Henry Higgins in you... turning flower girls into ladies...

The new production of "Sound of Music" has everything about it that Broadway would hate. The lead was picked in a "UK Idol" sort of show-down; it has kids in it; it is familiar... waaaaay familiar; it's simple and untextured; it's claim to fame is a movie with Julie Andrews; all that rot. You can hear the critics sharpening their keyboards.

Well, bollocks to them.

This show is so familiar as to be iconic, and that means it passes over from kitsch to classic. Most people who are alive have grown up with this movie, this story, burned into a special set of holiday-family-feel/good neurons. I dare you not to get caught up in it if you go ahead and buy the ticket.

Connie Fisher, who won the "How do you solve a problem like Maria?" play-off on the BBC, pretty much channels Julie Andrews, and the production stays so close to the movie as its source that this is quite welcomed. She is apparently committed to 8 shows per week all the way through April or something.

Trimming a three-hour movie into a play requires some compromise, so a few of the scenes are missing, combined, or integrated, and some of the songs appear in different contexts. There are 3 new numbers that are obviously placed to give the other adult actors something to do other than to be foils for the kids. And presumably to give Connie a break.

Like some wonderfully odd bookend to "Cabaret" (and the order in which I saw these was no accident), we move to 1938 and the movement of the Nazis from Germany to Austria. Like "Cabaret," the presence of the Third Reich is more overt than in some earlier productions of these materials. THe bad guys don't even need black hats when they have red armbands.

The kids, selected from thousands and thousands, I hear, are terrific. I credit the source material as much as the actors, here; I think the parts are written well. And although you have seen this whole thing play out so many times before, it is a credit to the script and the actors and the music that you simply want to see it again, to make sure it turns out alright... sort of like Santa's visit.

The sets are complex and well executed. They solved the problem of the mountain in a terribly interesting way. The Abbey set is a textbook testimony for the impact that good lighting has on a stage.

Cheers, London.

Saturday, December 30, 2006

December 30 2006 Wellkommen, bienvenue, welcome...




Arrived at about 10 AM... checked in... headed to the TKTS booth...

Grabbed a ticket to the show I wanted to see: the new production of "Cabaret" (more on that in a moment), which was scheduled to begin at 7:45 PM... and slipped into the 5-7:35 PM "early" show of "Mamma Mia!" (only possible cuz the two theaters are a couple of blocks apart).

"Mamma Mia!" is my post-trip shot of adrenaline. Skipped out of there and headed to Berlin, 1931...

This is an extremely interesting production of "Cabaret." It's bad to compare, but I think that it would be a miracle for any production to compare with the version of this that played for so long at the site of "Studio 54" in Manhattan. The entire STUDIO 54 (of disco era fame, so there was already an historical ambiance to the place) had been transformed into a Cabaret motif, including a generous bank of 4-person dinner-theater tables with little dim lights, and waitstaff service for an hour before the show. The rest of the seating was made up of plush sofas and stuffed chairs. The stage was projected into this set of tables, and the dance/musical troupe was out warming up and interacting prior to the show. It was really an incredible and complete experience, and the literal depth of the acting space gave them lots of options. I got to see this production 4 times before it closed.

So, it was interesting to see the constraints of a production done on a conventional stage. For what it lacked (only compared with the Studio 54 environment), it made up for in other ways.

Most importantly, while you knew at the outset that this play is about the birth of Nazi Germany and the death of the Berlin lifestyle, the Studio 54 version minimized a great deal of that in favor of its "Broadway musical" status. I went with more than a few people who did not even put it all together until the last scene, where what had been relatively subtle allusion finally came clear.

In this new production, there is nothing subtle, and all to great effect.

None of the leads is particularly nice. Sally Bowles, in particular, is conveyed as a satisfyingly self-absorbed lush and drug-addict. The emcee last night was the understudy, so I hope the regular does a better job; even done at merely very good, this perforamance was weak given the demands on this part to pull the various narratives together.

This director makes two particularly interesting choices. At the end of the first act, when you absolutely know for the first time that it is the rise of Nazism with the singing of "Fatherland," the birth of the Aryan Nation is symbolized by appearance of the emsemble, fully nude, in an openly sculpted display on and above the stage. At the end of the second act, when the Cabaret (literally) falls, and these decadent rouges are sent to the concentration camps, they once again appear nude, but this time as a huddled mass of bodies. It took a few silent moments after the curtain fell for the first person to start to applaud.

Off to TKTS for today's shows...

Thursday, December 28, 2006

December 28 2006

Heading to London for the weekend.

Ciao.

Someone sell some art, or something.

Wednesday, December 27, 2006

December 27 2006

In 1976, Gerald Ford was the first person for whom I cast a vote for President of the United States. I've cast 8 Presidential votes since then. I'm 6 and 3, but frankly, I'd be happy for a do-over on one of them.

Tuesday, December 26, 2006

December 26 2006

Happy Boxing Day.

If I come around with a box, as your humble servant to things Aartvarky, will you drop in it a token?

Just a reminder, in case you feel the need for some original artwork and you're... yaaaaaaaawnnnnnn... so excited by the recent action at eBay, you can always empty your brains onto the countertop and buy these little gems... the perennially available...







Sunday, December 24, 2006

December 24 2006

I miss regular monthly issues of Cerebus.

I know there will never be a #301.

But wait... the number line does go in the other direction, too, right?

How about a maxiseries.... Cerebus # -25 to Cerebus # -1. I know that puts Cerebus 0 out of the continuity, but what the heck. That is what I want for Christmas.

Saturday, December 23, 2006

December 23 2006

Back in the US.

Received a wonderfully sweet package from j_ay. Thanks, dude.

Who... who will be the next "Diary of a Commission"?

Friday, December 22, 2006

December 22 2006 Tan Zhe Temple

Tan Zhe is a Buddhist Temple in the western hills outside the city of Beijing. It was built 1700 years ago in the Jin Dynasty. Its original name was Jia Fu Temple, meaning the temple of Auspicious Fortune. Throughout the Jin, Yuan, Ming and the successive dynasties, the Temple underwent renovations and changes of name. During the Qing Dynasty (1692), it was renamed Xiu Yun Temple. As there are a Long Tan (or deep pool) at the back of the temple and Mulberries, the temple is usually called Tan Zhe Temple (Tan means deep pool and Zhe refers to the trees). The cluster of 75 pagodas... originally the grave markers for monks... is extremely cool.


Thursday, December 21, 2006

December 21 2006 Cerebus 153 p8



End date: December 19, 2006
eBay item number: 110068145417
Seller: lowbit67
Buyer: packt_like_sardines
Price; $898.88

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

December 19 2006

Here's a different view of the Bo Ya Pagoda. The diplomacy here is going quite well. Three projects with in-principle agreements that ought to get me back here at least twice in 2007.

Next year: learn some Mandarin...
Next year: learn some Mandarin...


Monday, December 18, 2006

December 18 2006

Far be it from the students at Peking University to skate in a simple "figure 8" pattern on the ice of the Unnamed Lake.

Sunday, December 17, 2006

December 17 2006 "And, lo... Again in the East..."

Ni Hao! from Beijing - I'm here trying to get some projects going in the newly formed Joint Institute between the University of Michigan and Peking University. I've mentioned before how much I enjoy travelling to China... and the food, did I mention the food?















I'm staying is a really nice apartment in the David Packard International Faculty Pavillion, which is situated on the north shore of the "Unnamed Lake" in the northern part of campus. Here was the view of the Bo Ya ("erudite & elegant") Pagoda outside my window this morning, as my colleague and I headed out for breakfast at some little noodle joint outside the south gate. Usually, we count on menus with pictures, but this was not the sort of place that visitors go to. Fortunately, there were enough nice people in there eating a variety of things, so we just needed to point at what other people were eating to place our order. I am sure we were some sort of spectacle. Some nice students who spoke really good English came in and helped translate the menu for us ... so now we can point at what we want tomorrow! I have GOT to learn at least a little Mandarin.

Um... let's see... Cerebus art... I always wondered if they needed to lay down the watercolors before they inked... I am still enjoying seeing that Dr Strangeroach piece evolve.


Wednesday, December 13, 2006

December 13 2006 "And, lo... in the East..."

"Mommy, what's that?"

"Why, sonny... I think that's an actual Cerebus page for auction. Land-o-goshen... and it is not one of the 3 repeats that have been flotsamming about the intertubes for the last few months. You gonna bid onnit?"

"You betcher ass I am."

End date: December 19, 2006
eBay item number: 110068145417
Seller: lowbit67


Monday, December 11, 2006

December 11 2006

Ten months into the project, and http://www.onethousandpaintings.com/ has sold over 700 of the 1000 paintings (or non-paintings, as j_ay would maintain, I think). Number 81 is the lowest number available, and it can be yours - all yours - for the low, low price of $735.20... while the highest (and least expensive painting) is number 566 for $347.20...


Saturday, December 09, 2006

December 9 2006 Feh...

There is that point, sometime in your late twenties or early thirties, when no one even thinks that you ought to be "carded" any more.

Today, I had my very first taste of the other side of that coin.

"Two tickets for Casino Royale, please."

"Will that be two adult or two senior?

Feh. The taste was rather bitter.

Friday, December 08, 2006

December 8 2006 Commissions...

I am enjoying greatly the step-by-step look at Dave doing that "Dr Strangeroach" commission over at http://davesim.blogspot.com/ (or, the highly formatted version at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cerebus/

All that insider stuff about how creative folk think about what they are doing, and how they make their decisions... yummy.

With the change-ups in how the commissions are being handled, I wonder where I am in the queue, now, and if that pair of 50th birthday drawings for me and wreckless is still on the radar.

Ger... when you get back from vacation... drop me a line.

Thursday, December 07, 2006

December 7 2006

I have a 1994 Saab with a bum transmission that I ditched last week for a 2007 Prius... I wonder if stoph-man would trade the Saab for this page? After all, they are getting the same mileage...





















December 7, 2006
eBay item # 290053514374
Seller: stoph-man
opening bid: $199.99 (no bidders)


Last Appeared:

November 28, 2006
eBay item # 290053514374
Seller: stoph-man
opening bid: $199.99 (no bidders)


November 18, 2006
eBay item # 290049699612
Seller: stoph-man
opening bid: $199.99 (no bidders\)


November 1, 2006
eBay item # 290043503595
Seller: stoph-man
Buyer: none
opening bid: $299.99 (no bidders)

Saturday, December 02, 2006

December 2 2006 Museum...

A few days ago, in a comment, j_ay wrote:

Which does beg the question: how many works _do_ you have hanging up? How do you store your collection? Do you rotate pieces?

One would have to imagine you’d need a mansion and hang everything, with no space in between, to display everything…and I have a feeling you don’t just collect comic art, so some of the art would go undisplayed due to, lemme guess, Broadway/musical/theatre posters (more than likely autographed), non-comic art, Periodic Tables (in every room), knick knacks (sp?), etc.
Consider this a blog theme for some time when you’re bored…


My kingdom for a mansion!

What is frrrreaky is how you nailed this, j_ay.

I have a collection of signed Broadway and theatrical posters. Gulp. And I collect quite a bit of non-comic art, too. Double-gulp.

Most all of the comic art is stored in the best sleeves I could find, in zipped leather portfolios, and securely sequestered away. One of the motivators to scan these and create the "Comic Art Museum" was because I wanted to be able to look at them every now and then, and it was impossible to think about pulling them out... putting them back... etc. And every now and then, I get the urge to cruise through a part of the collection I have not looked at in a while, so I can link from anywhere in the world I happen to be and do that.

Of course, I wanted others to be able to look at this stuff, too. A lot more about that in a moment.

The question of what is framed and on display is a little artificial because the first stuff I liked the most got framed and displayed and then it was, well, harder to imagine framing and displaying cuz no space at the Inn.

Cerebus art hanging on the wall: 29p19 (the first piece I ever purchased, and the first of the re-creation pages), the two page sequence from "talking to Tarim" (91p15-16), the covers to 69 and 91, and the flaming carrot page with the "Mr Geepus the Sweeper" panel in it; and all three of the color Epic pages

Other comic art on the wall: FF286p21(Byrne's 5-panel retelling of the Dark Phoenix saga during the first resurrection), a huge Flaming Carrot.rescues.babe piece, and 4 of the color Mage "Interlude I" pieces. I have 4 commissions from Gene Colon: iconic drawings of Captain America, Hulk, Iron Man, and Sub-Mariner, as an homage to the first two Marvel comics I ever bought, as Tales to Astonish and a Tales of Suspense, after being inspired by the 1966 pseudo-cartoons... "When Captain American throws his MIGHT-y shield..." (you definitely had to be there... and clearly some people were, given that the wonderful character of "Hiro" in the new series "Heroes" was carrying a membership card from the MMMS in his wallet).

I have the color cover my Matt Wagner to Terminal City #7 in my office at the U.

And as long as we are talking about collecting, let me wax philosophical for a moment. I'll dismiss at the outset the mercenary investor angle. There are people who do that, and they do it for that reason, and they are in a constant uphill climb to upgrade their portfolio to optimize the ability to, um, upgrade it some more. These are not collectors; they enable collectors.

I think that the drive for creating legacy underpins a great deal of human motivation. From the adolescent graffiti left by Paleothilic hands on the Gargas Cave walls in France (see: Guthrie, R. Dale The Nature of Paleolithic Art) to their modern equivalents, humans seem to have a strong sense of legacy that, I would further argue, is tied to our keen sense of mortality. "I was here... I want to be remembered... I mattered... here is the little bit of the world you can understand because I was in it."

People curate their lives to shape legacy. In their collections... in their publications... in their families... As a species, we do it collectively: in our museums, in art and theater, on gravestones, in libraries, in cultural transmission...

The internet is what it is because it combines the personal and the public in a way that was impossible to imagine, and it speaks to this core need. It speaks to the need that I have in writing that previous sentence. And, when you think about it, it also speaks to the previous sentence to this one.

We curate our lives to create narratives about ourselves to leave a legacy. In what we collect because we want others to come by later and see how we recognized something that others are now interested in; in what we write/play/draw/act as a message to the future; and in what we instill in the next generation, whether you do it one kid at a time (through genetics) or whether you are in this business of education (through memetics), the sense of legacy is palpable.

Regardless of its controversy, I am reminded of how affected I was by the last line in "The History Boys." I thought the play was good enough, and I was going to give it a thumbs-up anyhow. But Hector comes back and delivers the last line... three words... and it just put it over the top for me because it was the core sentiment of legacy: we inherit, we educate... it's temporary and transcient (all of us), so only the legacy we inherit and manage to improve upon is what matters, and only then if it survives us.

Hector, appearing as a ghost (oops, sorry, should have put the spoiler warning in there) appeals to those who are left behind that the only way to keep history alive is by handing it down as best they can to the next generation. And then he says 'Pass it on,' and the play ends. I think I shuddered for an full hour.

It was too bad that this theme was not more pronounced in the play as a whole. (I have no idea if the movie preserves this, or if it just focuses on the titilation and gay themes, and even at that, it's harder to get as invested in movie characters, as least for me, compared with live performance, when the living body is there... especially with a resurrection.)

OK, j_ay, thanks for that question.

Friday, December 01, 2006

December 1 2006 Sold...

This one is certainly has an interesting history. Margaret paid about $500 for it in May '05, sold it for $866 in September, and here is sold for a loss back at the $500 level. Market value rules.




















ended December 1, 2006
eBay item number: 270060644210
Seller: lucia666
Buyer: joalbri
Price: $504

Last appeared:

November 15, 2006
eBay item number: 270052972175
Seller: lucia666
Buy it now price: $725 or BO


August 6 2006
eBay item number: 270013581150
Seller: lucia666
Buyer: (none)
Buy it now price: $850 or BO
(two offers were declined)

May 3 2006
eBay item number: 6626205661
Seller: lucia666
Buyer: (none)
Price: ($490; reserve not met)

Prior to that:

September 17 2005

eBay item number: 6560418892
Seller: meowfisher
Buyer: lucia666
Price: $866

And prior to that:

May 11 2005

eBay item number: 6527737895
Buyer: meowfisher
Price: $511